Lib Dem MP Norman Baker has called for reform of the Commons oath:
"Would you agree that in the 21st century it’s somewhat anachronistic, not to say objectionable that when MPs arrive here with a proper democratic mandate, having been elected, they are not allowed to take their seat until they have sworn the Oath of Allegiance to an unelected institution,” he said.
“Wouldn’t it be more appropriate in these days for an oath to be taken to follow the law, uphold democracy and serve one’s constituents?” (PA)
In response, Leader of the Commons Geoff Hoon had this to say:
“This was a great constitutional debate in the 19th century. I see no particular desire at the present time in the 21st century for that great constitutional debate to be repeated.
“But if I’m wrong and there is a large body of opinion in the House that wishes to revisit that great constitutional debate, I would be willing to raise it with ministerial colleagues.”
It seems New Labour modernisation doesn’t extend to those institutions which underpin the power and patronage of the executive.
It’s interesting that Mr Hoon doesn’t think we need a debate because we had one a hundred years ago, before the introduction of universal suffrage.
Leave a Reply